My summary of yesterday’s JISC Collections Roadshow in Edinburgh/Musselburgh
Report on JISC Collections satisfaction survey (Vicky Legge)
- High priority from respondents that licences should be 100% compliant with the NESLi2 model licence
- Open Access main priority is gaining discounts on APCs
I can’t help wondering about value of satisfaction survey about a product you’re virtually obliged to use… it’s not like there’s much choice!
- JISC Collections’ priority for 2013 includes negotiating best price to minimise increases
- Also ebook agreements, continuing to add publishers to JUSP, developing JISC eCollections
- 2014 NESLi2 renewals: AIP, CUP Journals, IoP Publishing, NPG, OUP, Project MUSE
Update on upcoming renewals (Richard Savory)
- “We have no control whatsoever about how much they increase the access fee…”
- “Keeping price increases as low as possible” but this still means we’re having to make cuts as our budgets shrink…
- Possible movement between JISC bands to reflect budget situation? Not going to help if we all shift down one
- Seeking clarity over post-cancellation access – perpetual access to previously paid-for content
- Negotiations are seeking to ensure that licences take APCs paid into account to avoid double-dipping
- Usage trends: usage is up 2012 vs 2011 on the whole. Exceptions: IoP (-1%), Project MUSE (-0.14%). Maybe to do with Arxiv/Open Access?
- Nature Publishing Group goes from strength to strength re: usage, making it hard to keep price increases down
- ACS usage flat; RSC up on last year
- Small publishers update: 21 new offers this year; new deals for BMC, ICE, NRC, RSM, Zeta Books; several more under consideration for 2014
JISC bands (Carolyn Alderson)
- JISC bands changing from A-E to 1-6 to introduce slight increase for band 1 & decrease for band 6 (and some of 5) – spread costs a bit more
- One band E institution is changing to band 5, with 28.72% increase
- Several mentions of increasing charges tied to increasing usage… but increased usage doesn’t change the publishers’ overheads, so why charge more?
Update from Thomson Reuters
- “It’s the year of the WoK renewal!”
- He is going to try to explain the difference between WoK and WoS (good luck with that) [@richperkinslib: My attempt at a stir-fry in a wos was a miserable failure]
- “It’s more difficult for you to manage than it is for us to administer” and an acknowledgement of difficulties accommodating walk-in users!
- New search architecture for WoK
- Transforming WoS into WoK: expansion of citations, extension of regional content, a new design philosophy
Pondering: publishers – which of you would like to be first to be well-known for a good reason rather than a bad one?
- WoS (product) = past, WoK (platform) = future. So that’s that, then. New pricing model will be more like a Big Deal bundle
- Medline… available through variety of vendors. But if the product isn’t the same, why keep same name? Very hard for users to grasp difference
- Thomson Reuters are looking to introduce a common metadata standard across repositories
- “We need to break free from the shackles of…” Sadly the rep paused to think and then steered sentence in new direction
- Someone asks about how to reconcile availability of more info with shrinking budgets…
- … Rep: “these are the cards we’ve been dealt… we just have to work with it”
Seems like the elephant in the room is The Cost Of Your Subs Is Just Too High
- JISC employee suggests that new bands may help – no they won’t, all they do is redistribute costs, not challenge prices!
- From @moananddrone (MT): Indeed. This is why Gold OA with corporate publishers is a fallacy as their APCs are defined by brand, not measured by cost.
Demo of Knowledge Base+
@orangeaurochs I’m going to write a murder mystery which is solved using the knowledge that no two lists of ebooks are ever identical.
- seems especially appropriate during presentation about combining and managing data sources in KB+!
JUSP (Vicky Legge)
- JUSP [the Journal Usage Statistics Portal] provides a single point of access to ejournal usage data – can use federated login
- 152 UK HE and research council libraries in JUSP, and over 50 publishers. Can use it for SCONUL returns
- JUSP can help you identify usage of core titles in a deal, and compare with unsubscribed titles in the deal
- JUSP is a free service!
Janet update (Robert Prabucki)
- Janet is the UK’s National Research & Education Network (NREN) – private network provider
- Janet is not-for-profit, and is part of the new company called “JISC Collections & Janet”
- Janet national backbone and regional hubs being upgraded - Janet6 will be switched on this month
JISC eCollections update (Richard Savory)
- JISC MediaHub has improved advanced search, new MyMediaHub section, new collections including IET.tv and Courtald
And a bit of chat about licences…
Decision tool for determining if partner college students count as HE authorised users… Survey results re: decision tool suggest that it didn’t help to clarify the situation about whether partner college students counted
Le sigh. RT @daveyp: @laurajwilkinson Think we were once told by a vendor “just don’t ask” when we asked about partner colleges
I asked a question about whether JISC Collections have the appetite for renegotiating some of the T&Cs of the licences. The wording of parts of the NESLi2 licences is out of step with the variety of modes of study that are available at many UK HE institutions, and above all, the wording has evolved from the regulations for print materials, which don’t translate well into a digital environment.
One of the JISC Collections employees said that various documents were available to help with clarifying what you can and can’t do (e.g. exactly who our authorised users are) but I explained that this creates uncertainty and that senior library staff may not be willing to take a risk on interpretation – it is better for the original rules to be straightforward.
My suggested rewriting of the Ts&Cs:
I license this resource for educational, non-commercial use only; and I trust my professional library colleagues to do what is necessary to enable such use to any and all users who wish it. Love, [publisher] xx